Bittensor vs NEAR Protocol
NEAR Protocol (NEAR) is the larger of the two, worth 1.1× Bittensor's market cap as of 13 September 2026. Compare TAO and NEAR on price, market cap, supply and performance below.
Bittensor vs NEAR Protocol
Lines are normalized to the % change from the start of the visible range, so coins with very different prices stay visually comparable.
| Metric |  TAO |  NEAR |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $234.63 | $2.3011 |
| Market cap | $2.66B | $3.01B |
| 24h volume | $146.96M | $221.86M |
| Market cap rank | #34 | #29 |
| 1h change | +0.30% | +0.44% |
| 24h change | -0.27% | -4.58% |
| 7d change | -6.30% | -5.66% |
| 30d change | +19.25% | +43.97% |
| All-time high | $757.60 | $20.44 |
| % from ATH | -69.03% | -88.74% |
| Circulating supply | 11.34M TAO | 1.31B NEAR |
| Max supply | 21M TAO | Uncapped |
| Listed exchanges | 20 | 20 |
Data as of 13 September 2026
How Bittensor and NEAR Protocol differ
Size. Market cap, not price, is what ranks these two against each other. NEAR Protocol carries the larger market cap of the pair — 1.1 times Bittensor's. A lower price per coin says nothing about which is the bigger asset, only that the supply is divided differently.
Supply. Compare circulating supply against max supply for each. The coin with most of its supply already issued faces less future sell pressure from unlocks and emissions than one still releasing.
Liquidity. 24-hour volume measured against market cap shows how actively each trades. Thin volume means wider spreads and sharper moves in both directions, whatever the market cap says.